Double-Edged Sword — OR — Planning & Discipline — What Does Your Discipleship Look Like?
A Makhaira (ma – ki – rah) is the name used, in Koine Greek, (Created, in part by Alexander the Great as the common language for his huge military.) a dead language, for sword. It was often used, (to the confusion of many) when talking about the sword used by Roman soldiers. They actually used, for 2-3 centuries, a sword referred to as gladius.Keep the faith — slowly but surely, this will dovetail into real estate investing for retirement.
The gladius was different. It’s design aided the Roman legionary’s battlefield tactics. First, it was much shorter than what we’ve come to know as a sword. The blade was usually only 19-20″ long. Second, it was double edged, able to cut savagely both ways — a huge improvement. Third, its design went away from the oft used leaf shape, to a simple, straight blade.
These changes were a result of Rome’s enemies modifying their defenses. I won’t bore you with the details here, but here’s a description of what a legionary was now able to do in battle.
While holding his shield with one hand, he held the gladius in the other, like most soldiers of the time. However, his sword sported a much shorter blade, which helped him get inside his opponent. Also, if his first downward slanting-cutting motion missed his target, it wasn’t necessary to raise his sword arm to try again. He simply reversed the motion, essentially a backhand, and saved precious time, (if not his life) by wounding or killing his opponent that much more quickly. Also, because he was working with the relatively shorter blade, and was therefore more easily able to get inside his enemy’s kill zone, it was far easier for him to thrust into the abdomen, an almost guaranteed kill shot.
It was a truly effective (read: nasty) weapon, made possible by it’s planning, vision, knowledge of the enemy, and ultimately, design.
Where’s the Roman legionary’s flexibility? His javelin, known as a pilum. It was roughly seven feet long. He used it for both throwing, and thrusting. He had a weapon for close, savage, infighting in the gladius. His javelin gave him the option of dealing with his enemy from a longer distance. The goal was, however, the same for both weapons — victory on the battlefield.
And yet…
Most military historians agree — the gladius wasn’t really the primary reason for Rome’s military dominance. It was their vision, forward planning, objectivity, but most of all — their massively superior training — which produced brutally reliable discipline. Their vision, planning (Purposeful?), and objectively focused discipline, not only carried out that superior training — but created the ability to be flexible when confronted with (sometimes rapidly) changing circumstances.
No comments:
Post a Comment